Emilia Javorsky, MD, MPH, is the Director of the Futures Program at the Future of Life Institute. A physician-scientist and entrepreneur, she specializes in the development of medical technologies and is a mentor at Harvard's Wyss Institute. Recognized as a Forbes 30 Under 30 and a Global Shaper by the World Economic Forum, Javorsky is committed to guiding emerging technologies towards ethical, safe, and beneficial applications. With a strong foundation in AI, biotech, and nuclear risk management, she champions the responsible evolution of transformative tech for humanity's advancement.
Session Summaryβ
Emilia envisions a future where our innate talents join forces with artificial intelligence to tackle global challenges. This isn't merely about the speed of AI advancements, but how they harmonise with human goals. Emilia stresses the importance of creating positive narratives, ones that integrate AI with genuine human empathy, pointing towards a world where technology complements, not replaces, our connections. To get here, however, she emphasises the need for thoughtful regulation, which moves away from only-theoretical approaches, and promotes an inclusive, multi-stakeholder approach. Emilia sees this pathway as a means to harness AI's capabilities fully. Looking ahead, she believes AI can better human health, pioneer bioengineering, and aid in space exploration, whilst enhancing human connection. For her, itβs more than just mitigating risk β it's about unlocking the vast potential that AI and human collaboration promise.
βEmilia Javorsky, MD, MPH, is the Director of the Futures Program at the Future of Life Institute. A physician-scientist and entrepreneur, she specializes in the development of medical technologies and is a mentor at Harvard's Wyss Institute. Recognized as a Forbes 30 Under 30 and a Global Shaper by the World Economic Forum, Javorsky is committed to guiding emerging technologies towards ethical, safe, and beneficial applications. With a strong foundation in AI, biotech, and nuclear risk management, she champions the responsible evolution of transformative tech for humanity's advancement.
β
Philipp Lenssen from Germany has been exploring between technology and art for all his life. He developed sandbox universes Manyland and wrote a technology blog for 7 years. He's currently working on new daily pictures at Instagram.com/PhilippLenssen.
β
Emilia envisions a future where our innate talents join forces with artificial intelligence to tackle global challenges. This isn't merely about the speed of AI advancements, but how they harmonise with human goals. Emilia stresses the importance of creating positive narratives, ones that integrate AI with genuine human empathy, pointing towards a world where technology complements, not replaces, our connections. To get here, however, she emphasises the need for thoughtful regulation, which moves away from only-theoretical approaches, and promotes an inclusive, multi-stakeholder approach. Emilia sees this pathway as a means to harness AI's capabilities fully. Looking ahead, she believes AI can better human health, pioneer bioengineering, and aid in space exploration, whilst enhancing human connection. For her, itβs more than just mitigating risk β it's about unlocking the vast potential that AI and human collaboration promise.
"I've been operating in a highly regulated field that is regulated for very good reasons. When we develop technology, we need to make sure we're developing technology that delivers more benefit than risk."
"I really felt like we're engineering power a little bit faster than wisdom, and that sort of thing kept me up at night. That's what led me to FLI."
"The job is whatever is needed at the moment, and that is highly dynamic and changes day to day."
"I think what we're seeing is there is so much room and we need so much more talent engaging and working on these issues use because the needs are just so great and also so consequential for where we head as a species that really any background that you come from there is a way that you can positively contribute to moving the sort of collective field forward. It's about taking the initiative and what if you're really excited about the issues then think about the skills you have and how they could be applied and then you know talk to people go find people and like you will find a home someplace because the needs are just so great right now"
"Those are the areas that I think we're going to need to see a lot more work done on and I think that is especially true with the increasing power of large language models..."
"He basically just changed the valence of the ld50 so instead of trying to make it safe try to make it toxic and give it an input of a very common nerve agent VX..."
"There's this false dichotomy that like regulation is against progress. I think regulation is the way you safely enable progress and actually is the thing that's better for the technology to realize its positive potential in the long run."
"All of those positive outcomes with technology are still very much on the table and it's what we do today that takes us there."
"You need that sort of goal post of where do we want to go with it to give you that hope and excitement about building that actual future vision that you'd want to live in."
"Injecting a few kinds of items of Hope here and there could maybe at least provide a bit of an alternative view."
"I think it could be amazing what's happening in AI for our understanding of biology. Biology is a field that still lacks first principles."
"These are tools that just as easily could be designed to build Bridges to encourage changes in thinking to open up people's minds to cultivate curiosity to cultivate play."
"For me what was interesting, it wasn't just like one individual story that was great, but collectively, reading through every single of these proposals, changed my general outlook a little bit."
"Definitely want to do more of this style of work which is like engaging sort of broad-based voices on what Futures we want to live in and with AI that we develop safely and responsibly."
"What future do you want? What future should we be building? Showing the diversity of those visions and perspectives that are not often represented in what has been traditionally a pretty narrow techno-utopian narrative."
"This idea that there's no examples of regulating technology is false. We've done it in the past and we can do it again."
"Clarity and really knowing where one is standing and this being common knowledge that other actors will also abide by can actually be an enabling force."
"I think you do see a lot of innovation even just in the past few weeks, that are relatively solution based and so I think it is a pretty fast moving and exciting space"
"it's also important to put pen to paper and actually get specific on that and gain agreements on that because statements are great but it's actually operationalizing those to make concrete policies and concrete agreements that people sign on to that is the litmus test of like where we want to go"
"It is very important to have leading manufacturers and developers and our Pharmaceuticals involved in the regulatory discussions because they have a unique understanding of the requirements and the challenges and the opportunities in that space but they alone are insufficient because there are like certain conflicts of interests that come to the table right if you are the developer of those Technologies and so that is where the multi-stakeholder perspective of like also having independent scientists and Civil Society groups and other groups within government doing independent analysis is really important and key to getting the regulation right"
"There are a lot of levers that we can we can pull here in order to make sure we put in the appropriate guard rails that mitigate risks but still enable technology to develop and be applied and realize that potential"
"like people haven't thought very deeply about this topic for a long time but just now the gloves come off and it's really just prime time to implement a lot of stuff and with that in mind a lot of these bubbles are not getting super pragmatic"
"I also think that there's what that also could unlock for us as a species in terms of living longer, healthier, better lives on this planet β but also extending our reach through the cosmos and becoming a multi-planetary species."
"For someone new entering the space, whatever your background or training or perspective or where you come from, there's an opportunity to make a difference in this because the needs are so great."
"It's always just really exciting stuff tumbling out of your organization all the time, so I would say for people to just maybe sign up to you guysβ mailing list, listen to the podcasts and so forth. So thank you, thanks for doing the work that you do."
Considering the scenario of using AI for biofocused applications, it gives me hope that we're on a good path for humanity. Sometimes I do struggle with thoughts of catastrophe, as it is much easier to break things than to build them. When something breaks in a catastrophe, it can happen fairly suddenly, whereas doing things right usually involves a lot of sustained hard work and careful engineering over time. Good things don't happen as easily as entropy taking over and breaking things. That said, AI for Bio is a piece of it.
I also think about what that could unlock for us as a species in terms of living longer, healthier, better lives on this planet, and also extending our reach through the cosmos and becoming a multi-planetary species. The limits to this, if you look at NASA's risk assessments, are mainly biologically based challenges. Our biology is not really meant to endure long distance space travel and microgravity and radiation.
There's a piece of Β bio that is like health and disease, a sort of moonshot of alleviating so much suffering. But also, we can go even further beyond just the elimination of disease. How do we live longer, and how do we take humanity to new frontiers? That's something I get excited about.
Emilia highlights the potential of AI in biology, not only in terms of transforming our healthcare and possibly extending our lifespans, but also its capacity to make us a multi-planetary species.
Emilia also discusses a broader application of biofocused AI, moving beyond the remediation of health and disease towards a more ambitious aim: extending human longevity and pushing the boundaries of humanity to new frontiers. It's these far-reaching possibilities that excite her most about the future.
Emilia's eucatastrophe, or optimistic vision for the future, revolves around leveraging AI for biological advancements. Her ultimate hope is that these developments would not only lead to improved health and longevity for humanity on Earth, but also enable us to overcome biological limitations and become a multi-planetary species. This vision is broad, encompassing both the remediation of diseases and the push towards new frontiers of human achievement and exploration.